Last month, in United States District Court, Central District of California, Judge Stephen Wilson dismissed the lawsuit filed by Heavyweight contender Dominic Breazeale and his trainer Manny Robles against WBC Heavyweight Champion Deontay Wilder, Marcellus Wilder (Deontay's younger brother) and Marriott International, Inc. in regards to a brawl that broke out in the Birmingham Marriott lobby after Wilder's title defense against Gerald Washington on February 25, 2017.
The complaint alleged assault and battery against the Wilder brothers, as well as premises liability and negligence against Marriott. According to the factual allegations of the complaint, Breazeale was sitting in the audience with his family after his thrilling victory over Izu Ugonoh and awaiting Deontay Wilder's fight, when Marcellus started shouting profanities at him. Marcellus then came over and stood in front of Breazeale, who had his son in his lap and continued to taunt and provoke Breazeale. Eventually, Breazeale decided to leave and return to the Marriott to avoid a confrontation.
The complaint further alleges that Deontay Wilder then made threatening statements about Breazeale at the post-fight press conference, including stating that it "ain't a problem I want to see him [about] in the ring. So, I'll see him."
A few hours after Deontay's press conference, as Breazeale, his family and Robles were in the lobby on their way to dinner, they were confronted by Marcellus and Deontay. The complaint alleges that words were exchanged and both Deontay and Marcellus threw punches at Breazeale, Robles and others in the vicinity. As Breazeale and his family tried to escape, Breazeale's wife allegedly asked Deontay to stop trying to provoke a fight in front of Breazeale's children and Deontay allegedly replied: "Fuck your kids." As Breazeale turned around on the way to the elevator, Marcellus allegedly sucker-punched him in the back of the head.
There is some very limited video footage of the brawl courtesy of TMZ.
The complaint in the case was filed on April 13, 2017. Marriott moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction in the state of California. On July 7, 2017, the Court ruled in Marriott's favor dismissing the case against them. On July 21, 2017, the Court then filed an order to show cause why the case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution due to lack of proof that the summons and complaint had been served on all defendants. On August 9, 2017, the Court issued an order dismissing the case, stating the "[c]ase should have been closed on [entry of the order dismissing the case against Marriott] dated July 7, 2017."
See the orders dismissing the case, as well the order to show cause, below:
This blog is authored by Kurt Emhoff, a sports and entertainment attorney and boxing manager based in NYC. Kurt has represented clients in boxing for over 20 years. Kurt's current and former clients include world champions and contenders Cory Spinks, Paulie Malignaggi, Peter "Kid Chocolate" Quillin, Luis Collazo, Sam Soliman, Kermit Cintron, Derrick Gainer, Travis Simms, Terronn Millett, Peter Manfredo and Dmitriy Salita.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Boxing Esq. Podcast #73 - Tom Loeffler
This week's guest is promoter Tom Loeffler of 360 Promotions. We talked about Tom’s upcoming show on Friday at the Chumash Casino in ...
-
Today in D.C. Superior Court, Judge John Campbell filed an Opinion granting both defendant promoters DiBella Entertainment (DBE) and Headban...
-
My guest on this podcast is Rick Collins, a founding partner at the law firm of Collins, Gann McCloskey & Barry. Rick practices in the ...
-
Bonus Podcast from my interview last week with Scott Shaffer, litigation attorney and longtime senior boxing writer at Boxingtalk.com. Scot...
Testing.
ReplyDeleteThat is, clients who have an immediate need for cash but who have already exhausted or otherwise do not have other avenues of cash currently available to them.Business lawyer in Toronto
ReplyDeleteNothing compares to Weber using Genesis sort of grills. That is certainly the type gas grills which have been that will always make sure that they deliver a high performance part of down interval Personal injury law
ReplyDeleteI can give you the address Here you will learn how to do it correctly. Read and write something good. navigate here
ReplyDeleteNothing compares to Weber using Genesis sort of grills. That is certainly the type gas grills which have been that will always make sure that they deliver a high performance part of down interval Personal injury law
ReplyDeleteIdentify legal experts who have experience in your field. Success is not just a matter of knowing the law relative to a given business model, but integrating that understanding into review procedures, products and people.Boynton Beach divorce lawyers
ReplyDeleteYou have a good point here!I totally agree with what you have said!!Thanks for sharing your views...hope more people will read this article!!! lawyer in Dubai
ReplyDeleteThat is certainly the type gas grills which have been that will always make sure that they deliver a high performance part of down interval Personal injury law
ReplyDeleteI've been having troubles with a group of money owed, and I'm no longer sure what to do about it. It makes feel that I might want to work with a lawyer to look if I can file for financial ruin! They could be able to see what sort of financial ruin could work excellent for me.Sandy Utah car accident
ReplyDeleteI have been facing challenges with a cluster of debts and I am uncertain about the best course of action. It seems plausible to seek legal counsel to explore the possibility of declaring bankruptcy. An attorney can provide insight into the different types of bankruptcy and recommend the most suitable one for me.Speeding Ticket Lawyer
ReplyDeleteWhen a person seeks the services of a lawyer, the initial consultation is crucial as it will determine whether the lawyer will take up the case or not. During this first meeting, the lawyer will ask the client specific questions to gather information about the case. This questioning process helps the lawyer understand the details of the case and decide whether they are the right fit to represent the client. Therefore, the first interview is of great importance in the lawyer-client relationship.Unfair dismissal
ReplyDeleteEconomic law encompasses the legal rules and principles that govern economic activities, including trade, finance, and competition. It plays a vital role in regulating markets, protecting consumers, and ensuring fair competition. Economic law is particularly important in a globalized world, where cross-border transactions and multinational corporations are commonplace. Regulatory frameworks such as antitrust laws, intellectual property rights, and trade agreements seek to balance the interests of businesses, consumers, and governments. The complexity of economic law reflects the intricate nature of modern economies, where legal considerations are integral to commercial success and economic stability.interpol lawyer
ReplyDelete